Religious Extremism and Religious Moderation: Challenges and Opportunities for Contemporary Indonesian Society

• Admin

Religious life in the twenty-first century is marked by a serious tension. On one side, many people want to return to what they believe to be the purest form of religion. On the other side, modern societies need peace, dialogue, and coexistence among people of different faiths, cultures, and ways of life. This tension is especially visible in Indonesia, a country known for its religious diversity, cultural richness, and long tradition of living together across differences.

In such a society, the discussion about religious extremism and religious moderation is not only an academic issue. It is also a national concern. Religion in Indonesia is not merely a private matter between an individual and God. It also shapes public identity, social relations, education, politics, and community life. Because of this, the way people understand and practice religion can either strengthen national unity or weaken it.

Religious extremism usually begins with a rigid claim of truth. In Islamic terminology, this attitude is often associated with ghuluw, or excessive behavior in religion. It appears when a person or group goes beyond the limits of balance, wisdom, and fairness. Extremism can be seen in attitudes that reject criticism, refuse dialogue, and easily accuse others of being wrong, deviant, or even unbelievers. When this attitude is combined with violence, hatred, or coercion, it becomes a serious threat to social harmony.

The word “radicalism” itself comes from the Latin word radix, meaning “root.” In its original sense, being radical means wanting to change something from its roots. However, the word becomes dangerous when the desire for change is pursued through violence, intimidation, or actions that violate human dignity. Ayu Maisari, in “Tantangan Radikalisme dan Ekstremisme: Kajian Kritis Terhadap Ekstremisme Perspektif Moderasi Beragama,” published in Tadabbur: Jurnal Peradaban Islam 7, no. 2 (2025), explains that extremism must be understood critically because it often grows from a combination of religious misunderstanding, social frustration, and rejection of moderation.

In response to these challenges, the Indonesian government has promoted religious moderation as a national priority. Through the Ministry of Religious Affairs, the strengthening of religious moderation was included in the National Medium-Term Development Plan, or RPJMN 2020–2024. Religious moderation is understood as a fair and balanced way of practicing religion in a shared society. It is not about weakening religious commitment. Rather, it is about ensuring that religious commitment does not turn into hatred, violence, or hostility toward others.

Why Extremism Grows

To understand extremism, we need to look beyond theology. Religious extremism is rarely caused by one factor alone. It often grows from a combination of social, political, economic, psychological, and digital influences.

Classical sociologists have long shown that religion can play different roles in society. Émile Durkheim saw religion as a source of social solidarity. Through rituals, symbols, and shared beliefs, religion can unite people and create a strong collective identity. However, when religious identity is used to isolate or attack other groups, it can also become a source of division. Sindung Haryanto, in Sosiologi Agama: Dari Klasik Hingga Postmodern, explains that sociological theories of religion help us understand how religion can function both as an integrative force and, in certain situations, as a source of social conflict (Haryanto, 2015).

Karl Marx, meanwhile, criticized religion when it becomes a tool of power. Religion can be used to justify inequality, defend political interests, or calm people without solving their real problems. Max Weber also showed that religion is closely connected to meaning, authority, and social change. In a world filled with uncertainty, some people may turn to rigid religious movements because they offer certainty, identity, and a sense of belonging.

In Indonesia, at least five major factors can contribute to the rise of religious extremism. First, social and political injustice can create anger and frustration. When people feel marginalized, ignored, or treated unfairly, they may become vulnerable to radical narratives. Second, emotional reactions to perceived insults against religion can easily be mobilized by extremist groups. Third, anti-Western ideologies may frame modern values, democracy, or secular systems as threats to religion. Fourth, tension between rigid textual interpretations and local traditions can create cultural conflict. Fifth, psychological factors such as identity crisis, loneliness, and the search for meaning are especially influential among young people.

This is why educational institutions are very important. Young people are often idealistic, energetic, and searching for identity. If they are not guided by critical thinking and balanced religious understanding, they can become vulnerable to extremist narratives. Maisari’s 2025 study emphasizes that ideological vulnerability among students does not always mean direct involvement in violence, but it does show that campuses and schools are important spaces for ideological contestation.

Extremism in the Digital Age

The challenge becomes more complicated in the digital era. Today, people do not only learn religion from teachers, books, mosques, pesantren, or formal institutions. They also learn from short videos, social media posts, anonymous accounts, influencers, and online discussion groups. Digital technology has changed the way religious ideas spread.

Akbar Rizquni Mubarok and Sunarto, in “Moderasi Beragama di Era Digital: Tantangan dan Peluang,” published in Journal of Islamic Communication Studies 2, no. 1 (2024), explain that the digital era creates both challenges and opportunities for religious moderation. On one side, social media can spread peaceful religious messages quickly. On the other side, it can also spread hatred, provocation, and radical propaganda.

Social media algorithms are designed to increase engagement. This means that content that makes people angry, afraid, or emotionally involved often spreads faster than calm and balanced explanations. As a result, provocative religious content can easily become viral. A short video that attacks another group may receive more attention than a long and careful explanation by a qualified scholar.

The concepts of filter bubbles and echo chambers help explain this problem. Digital platforms often show users content similar to what they have already watched, liked, or shared. Over time, people may only see information that confirms their existing beliefs. They rarely encounter different perspectives. This can make their views more rigid and extreme.

Radicalization in the digital age is therefore not always a secret process that happens in closed rooms. It can happen openly through repeated exposure to online content. A person may begin by watching ordinary religious videos, then gradually be directed to more exclusive, intolerant, or extremist material. Without strong digital literacy, many users may not realize that they are being shaped by algorithms.

This is why religious digital literacy is no longer optional. It is necessary. People need to learn how to check information, recognize manipulation, understand algorithmic bias, and avoid spreading content that promotes hatred. Religious leaders, teachers, parents, and institutions must also be present in digital spaces with peaceful, clear, and responsible religious narratives.

Wasathiyah: The Islamic Foundation of Moderation

Islam offers a strong foundation for religious moderation through the concept of wasathiyah. The word wasath means middle, just, balanced, and best. In the Qur’an, Allah describes Muslims as ummatan wasathan, a middle and balanced community, in Surah al-Baqarah verse 143. This concept shows that Islam rejects extremism, whether in the form of excessiveness (ifrath) or negligence (tafrith).

Religious moderation in Islam does not mean compromising the principles of faith. It does not mean weakening religious identity or treating all beliefs as the same. Rather, it means practicing religion with wisdom, justice, balance, and respect for human dignity. A moderate Muslim can be deeply committed to Islam while still living peacefully with others.

Quraish Shihab explains that wasathiyah reflects wisdom and balance in religious life. It is a way of understanding Islam that avoids harshness, arrogance, and narrow-mindedness. Meanwhile, Azyumardi Azra has shown through his historical studies that Islamization in the Indonesian archipelago succeeded because earlier Muslim scholars used inclusive, adaptive, and culturally sensitive approaches. Islam was not spread mainly through coercion, but through education, trade, culture, Sufism, and social interaction.

This historical experience is important for Indonesia today. The strength of Indonesian Islam lies in its ability to combine religious commitment with cultural openness. Moderation is not a foreign idea imposed from outside. It is part of Indonesia’s Islamic history.

Operationally, religious moderation in Islam can be built on four principles. The first is tawassuth, or taking the middle path. The second is tawazun, or maintaining balance between revelation and reason, rights and responsibilities, individual devotion and social concern. The third is i‘tidal, or justice toward all people. The fourth is tasamuh, or tolerance toward differences. These principles make moderation not only a way of thinking, but also a way of acting.

Moderation as a Shared Religious Value

Religious moderation is not exclusive to Islam. Many religious traditions also teach balance, compassion, and self-control. In Buddhism, the doctrine of the Middle Way, or Majjhima Patipada, teaches people to avoid both excessive indulgence and extreme self-denial. In Hinduism, the concept of Tat Twam Asi teaches that every being has dignity and should be respected. In Confucianism, wisdom is central to building harmony among human beings, society, and nature.

This shows that moderation can become a shared ethical platform among religions. Indonesia’s diversity should not be seen as a threat. It is a form of social capital. When managed with wisdom, diversity can strengthen society. Different religious communities can work together to promote peace, justice, education, environmental care, and human dignity.

At their deepest level, religions call human beings to responsibility. They teach that life should not be guided by hatred, selfishness, or violence. They call people to protect the weak, respect others, and preserve the world as a shared home. This is why interfaith dialogue is important. Dialogue does not mean erasing differences. It means learning to live with differences without hostility.

Religious Moderation in Indonesian Policy and Education

The Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs has formulated four main indicators of religious moderation. They are national commitment to Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, tolerance among religious communities, rejection of violence, and openness to local wisdom. These indicators are important because Indonesia is not built on one religion alone, but on a shared national agreement that protects religious diversity.

The role of the Forum Kerukunan Umat Beragama, or FKUB, is also important in strengthening dialogue at the grassroots level. Religious harmony cannot be built only through speeches or official documents. It must be practiced in neighborhoods, schools, campuses, workplaces, and community organizations. People need to meet, talk, cooperate, and solve problems together.

Education is one of the most strategic spaces for strengthening moderation. Mohammad Khoirur Rozaq, Sofyan Habibi Anhar, and Muhammad Miftah, in their 2024 study “Implementasi Kebijakan Moderasi Beragama terhadap Harmoni Pendidikan Islam di SMAN 1 Bae Kudus,” show that religious moderation can be implemented through school culture and interfaith activities. One example is collective condolence visits, or takziyah, which can cultivate empathy and solidarity beyond religious boundaries.

This kind of educational practice is important because moderation cannot be taught only as a concept. It must be experienced. Students need to see examples of respect, cooperation, and compassion. They need to learn that religious difference does not prevent people from helping one another. When moderation becomes part of school culture, students are more likely to develop critical thinking, empathy, and resistance to extremist provocation.

At the university level, religious tutorial programs that present moderate, rational, and contextual perspectives can also strengthen students’ commitment to nationalism and tolerance. Campuses should not only produce intellectual intelligence, but also social wisdom. Students should be trained to think critically, respect differences, and reject violence in the name of religion.

The Way Forward

Religious extremism in Indonesia is not merely a theological problem. It is connected to social injustice, political polarization, identity crisis, economic inequality, and digital disruption. Therefore, the response must also be multidimensional. It is not enough to condemn extremism. Society must also address the conditions that make people vulnerable to extremist narratives.

There are at least four important steps that need to be strengthened. First, critical digital literacy must be taught at every level of education. Young people need to understand how social media algorithms work, how misinformation spreads, and how extremist propaganda manipulates emotions. Second, religious leaders and intellectuals must be more active in digital spaces. Peaceful and contextual religious messages should not be absent from the platforms where young people spend most of their time.

Third, religious moderation must be connected to social and economic justice. If inequality, marginalization, and discrimination are ignored, extremist groups can easily exploit public frustration. Moderation should not only be a slogan. It must also be supported by fair policies and inclusive development. Fourth, sincere and continuous interfaith dialogue must be expanded. Dialogue should not happen only during conflict, but should become a normal part of social life.

Religious moderation is not a final destination. It is a continuous process that must be nurtured again and again. Every generation faces its own challenges. Today, the challenge comes not only from physical spaces, but also from digital spaces. This means that moderation must be present in classrooms, mosques, churches, temples, community forums, and social media platforms.

In the Indonesian context, religious moderation is one of the keys to protecting national unity. It helps ensure that religion remains a source of mercy, not a source of disaster. It reminds people that religious commitment should make a person more compassionate, not more hateful; more just, not more oppressive; more humble, not more arrogant.

A peaceful society does not happen automatically. It must be built through education, dialogue, justice, and responsible religious understanding. If Indonesia can strengthen religious moderation while addressing the roots of extremism, then its diversity will not become a weakness. It will become one of the nation’s greatest strengths.

By Nurul Jannah, Student of the Ulama Cadre Education Program of Grand Mosque Istiqlal.